Court of Appeals of Kansas· 8/4/2000
State v. Staggs
Citations
- 9 P.3d 601
- 27 Kan. App. 2d 865
- 2000 Kan. App. LEXIS 790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When the factual circumstances of a crime involve a short, continuous, single incident comprised of several acts individually sufficient for conviction, jury unanimity requires only that the jury agree to an act of the crime charged, not which particular act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beier, Rulon, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KesselringSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 84×
- State v. VannSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 73×
- State v. ZabrinasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-06-01· cited 44×
- State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 41×
- State v. ArculeoCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-30· cited 19×
- State v. Garcia-MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-04-26· cited 14×
- State v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-04-13· cited 11×
- State v. HilsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-03-30· cited 8×
- State v. BANKS, JR.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-04-13· cited 5×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-11-25· cited 4×
- State v. VILLANUEVA, JR.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-12-07· cited 3×
- State v. CrossettCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-08-22· cited 3×
- State v. BaatrupCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-10-03· cited 1×
- State v. EscalanteCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-03-31· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.