Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/20/2001
State v. Hill
Citations
- 26 P.3d 1267
- 271 Kan. 929
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that after sexually assaulting 13-year- old, comment of \So where are we going to get it on?\ prior to again sexually assaulting girl sufficient evidence of solicitation
- expressing concern that prosecutors instead would believe they have carte blanche to rely upon harmless error review
- structural errors so intrinsically harmful, automatic reversal required without regard to existence of effect on outcome
- structural errors so intrinsically harmful, automatic reversal required without regard to existence of effect on outcome
- “In many multiple acts cases, the acts will be materially distinct and will be associated with different defenses, so a specific unanimity instruction will be required.”
- “In many multiple acts cases, the acts will be materially distinct and will be associated with different defenses, so a specific unanimity instruction will be required”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Six
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-01-24· cited 140×
- State v. VerserSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-06-06· cited 132×
- State v. VoylesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-22· cited 118×
- State v. ColstonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-23· cited 94×
- State v. KesselringSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 84×
- State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-10-16· cited 77×
- State v. BeachSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-25· cited 74×
- State v. VannSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 73×
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-08-10· cited 73×
- Pabst v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-09-19· cited 70×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 42×
- State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 41×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-11-27· cited 32×
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-03· cited 21×
- State v. ArculeoCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-30· cited 19×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-06-04· cited 15×
- State v. VinyardCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-11-14· cited 13×
- State v. DeanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-26· cited 12×
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-05-31· cited 12×
- State v. Kerri NicholasSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-08-19· cited 12×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
- People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-07-02· cited 521×
- State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
- State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 364×
- State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 178×
- State v. ScherzerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-05-20· cited 164×
- People v. CooksMichigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 126×
- United States v. Maria L. SayanD.C. Circuit· 1992-08-27· cited 102×
- United States v. Irwin A. SchiffSecond Circuit· 1986-09-15· cited 84×
- State v. LomagroWisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-07-01· cited 82×
- State v. ZamoraSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-12-14· cited 72×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-12-10· cited 69×
- State v. GarnesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-02-28· cited 59×
- State v. BelcherSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-04-21· cited 47×
- State v. DePriestSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-12-08· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.