Skip to main content

State v. Hill

Citations

  • 26 P.3d 1267
  • 271 Kan. 929
  • 2001 Kan. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that after sexually assaulting 13-year- old, comment of \So where are we going to get it on?\ prior to again sexually assaulting girl sufficient evidence of solicitation
  • expressing concern that prosecutors instead would believe they have carte blanche to rely upon harmless error review
  • structural errors so intrinsically harmful, automatic reversal required without regard to existence of effect on outcome
  • structural errors so intrinsically harmful, automatic reversal required without regard to existence of effect on outcome
  • “In many multiple acts cases, the acts will be materially distinct and will be associated with different defenses, so a specific unanimity instruction will be required.”
  • “In many multiple acts cases, the acts will be materially distinct and will be associated with different defenses, so a specific unanimity instruction will be required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.