Skip to main content
· 6/14/1983

Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376

Citations

  • 190 Conn. 371
  • 461 A.2d 422
  • 1983 Conn. LEXIS 533
  • 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the specific statutory criteria set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31-115 governing temporary injunctions in labor dispute cases
  • picketing which caused two-hour delays to enter or exit premises is unlawful
  • injunction is void when it is “so vague that [persons] of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • General Statutes § 31-115 permits the issuance of an injunction only upon the showing of, inter alia substantial and irreparable injury and the absence of an adequate remedy at law
  • General Statutes § 31-115 permits the issuance of an injunction only upon the showing of, inter alia, substantial and irreparable injury and the absence of an adequate remedy at law
  • affirming, as modified, injunction that prohibited only mass picketing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arthur H. Healey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.