· 6/14/1983
Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376
Citations
- 190 Conn. 371
- 461 A.2d 422
- 1983 Conn. LEXIS 533
- 119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the specific statutory criteria set forth in Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 31-115 governing temporary injunctions in labor dispute cases
- picketing which caused two-hour delays to enter or exit premises is unlawful
- injunction is void when it is “so vague that [persons] of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- General Statutes § 31-115 permits the issuance of an injunction only upon the showing of, inter alia substantial and irreparable injury and the absence of an adequate remedy at law
- General Statutes § 31-115 permits the issuance of an injunction only upon the showing of, inter alia, substantial and irreparable injury and the absence of an adequate remedy at law
- affirming, as modified, injunction that prohibited only mass picketing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arthur H. Healey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.