Skip to main content

State v. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton

Citations

  • 204 Conn. 177
  • 527 A.2d 688
  • 1987 Conn. LEXIS 913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating a claim of mootness more appropriately as a claim of collateral estoppel
  • ‘‘the question of whether a defendant maintains control over property sufficient to subject him to [public] nuisance liability normally is a jury question’’
  • defendants must exercise control over the property that is the source of the nuisance
  • continuity and unreasonable use of land are necessary elements of nuisance
  • trial court did not err in refusing to submit nuisance claim to jury, where no evidence to suggest defendant had control over land, even if pleadings considered in light most favorable to plaintiff
  • control as an element of nuisance is a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.