State v. Franklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The [circuit] court's factual conclusions as to the voluntariness of a statement will not be disturbed on appeal unless so manifestly erroneous as to constitute an abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Arnold
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-08· cited 37×
• State v. O'Neal
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-03-12· cited 17×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Jackson v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
• Michigan v. Mosley
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
• State v. Baccus
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 298×
• State v. Saltz
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 162×
• State v. Aleksey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-11-13· cited 111×
• State v. Wannamaker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 28×
• State v. Benjamin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-02· cited 14×