Skip to main content

State v. Fox

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4026

Syllabus

CRIMINAL LAW – felonious assault aggravated arson trial by jury consecutive sentence Crim.R. 52(B) plain error voir dire statements made by a prospective juror did not prejudice Appellant by poisoning the jury pool statements and/or video regarding Appellant's jail status did not amount to prejudice jury instructions INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – Sixth Amendment objections motion to suppress motion in limine mistrial Miranda waiver Appellant was not subject to a custodial interrogation at the time of the recorded conversation with the officer Appellant's Fifth Amendment rights were not violated the record does not reveal that Appellant's trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance pursuant to Strickland, Appellant fails to show that his representative's performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense judgment affirmed.

Judges: D'Apolito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.