Commonwealth v. Lehman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in context of probation violation hearings and application of exclusionary rule, Pennsylvania Constitution affords no greater protection than does federal constitution
• holding that in context of probation violation hearings and application of exclusionary rule, Pennsylvania Constitution affords no greater protection than does federal constitution
• declining to apply the exclusionary rule to parole and probation revocation proceedings -3- J. S47036/17 under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Fowler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-23· cited 444×
• Commonwealth v. Fusselman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-14· cited 146×
• Jones v. City of Philadelphia
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-25· cited 104×
• Commonwealth v. Arter, K., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-28· cited 58×
• Logan v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-03-10· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott
  Supreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-04-21· cited 108×
• Theodore v. Delaware Valley School District
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-20· cited 40×
• State v. Foster
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-30· cited 10×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-06-08· cited 4×