Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/28/2016
Commonwealth v. Arter, K., Aplt.
Citations
- 151 A.3d 149
- 637 Pa. 541
- 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2916
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the exclusionary rule applies to probation proceedings and that inadmissible evidence cannot be used to prove a probation violation
- noting that grand jury proceedings “play a special role in the law enforcement process” and are non-adversarial
- noting “this Court’s long-standing interpretation of Article I, Section 8 as embodying a strong individual privacy right”
- exclusionary rule applied in probation revocation proceedings to evidence gathered by police officers that was suppressed in a criminal trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saylor, Baer, Todd, Donohue, Dougherty, Wecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. LuczkiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-06-07· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. Johnson, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-26· cited 79×
- Commonwealth v. Bell, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-17· cited 38×
- In re Fortieth Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-27· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. LoughnaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-22· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-19· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. CarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-13· cited 21×
- Com. of Pa. v. FitzpatrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-14· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. GlassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-03· cited 15×
- Com. v. Rosendary, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-03-19· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. UpdikeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-13· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. McClearySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-10· cited 6×
- Com. v. Parson, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-28· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. Britton, S., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-22
- Commonwealth v. Alexander, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-12-22
- State of Iowa v. Amadeus Demetrius McclainSupreme Court of Iowa· 2025-05-02
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,184×
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-04· cited 776×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 357×
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 268×
- Commonwealth v. GarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-29· cited 255×
- Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-08· cited 232×
- Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 208×
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 193×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-27· cited 150×
- Commonwealth v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-05· cited 142×
- Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-28· cited 138×
Other cases named Commonwealth v. Arter, K., Aplt.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.