Arizona Supreme Court· 11/1/1977

State v. Fleming

Citations

571 P.2d 268
117 Ariz. 122
1977 Ariz. LEXIS 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the trial court has the discretion to curtail the scope of cross-examination when appropriate
holding that the trial court has the discretion to curtail the scope of cross-examination when appropriate
holding that the \right to cross-examination must be kept within `reasonable' bounds and the trial court has discretion to curtail its scope\
holding that the “right to cross-examination must be kept within ‘reasonable’ bounds and the trial court has discretion to curtail its scope”
finding the witness’s two-day stay in a mental institution three years prior to the relevant transaction had no bearing on his credibility
finding no abuse of discretion where the defendant could not show that further cross-examination regarding a witness’s brief stay in a mental hospital four years prior bore on his credibility where there was no indication that the witness continued to have mental problems

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Holohan, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.