· 9/16/2010
Andrews v. Com.
Citations
- 699 S.E.2d 237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that issues of the weight of the evidence are questions for the jury
- “[I]f the Commonwealth obtains convictions on both [instructions] it may not seek to have separate punishments imposed for each offense. Rather it must elect which [finding of guilt] it will proceed upon in the penalty-determination phase of the trial.”
- applying predecessors to Rules 5:17(c)(6) and 5:27(d)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lawrence L. Koontz, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.