Skip to main content

State v. Savage

Citations

  • 933 S.W.2d 497
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 221
  • 1996 WL 638227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reviewing court can look past label assigned to motion to determine whether it is \functional equivalent\ for another type of motion
  • holding that “the jury could reasonably infer that [defendant] had been driving the truck”
  • concluding that “a trial court’s JNOV ruling after a jury determination of criminal guilt accomplishes exactly the same effect as granting the defendant a new trial for insufficient evidence—a functional acquittal”
  • holding that when a jury returns a guilty verdict and the trial court grants the defendant’s motion for new trial based upon legal insufficiency of the evidence, double jeopardy prevents the trial court from entering any judgment other than an acquittal
  • holding reviewing court can look past labels and order granting motion for judgment non obstante veredicto was functional equivalent of granting of new trial, thereby allowing State to appeal
  • stating that a motion for new trial is “on the defendant’s motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Maloney, Meyers, Overstreet, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

101 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.