Prudhomme v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding abatement proper under TEX. R. APP. PROC. 43.6 where appellant was deprived of his right to counsel while 8 trying to present a motion for new trial and was thus prevented from making a record for appellate review
• no posttrial pleadings filed until defendant filed 3 pro se pleadings on 25th day after sentencing; record did not reflect that trial counsel was aware of pro se pleadings; appellate counsel appointed 58 days after sentencing
• deprivation of counsel during period for filing motion for new trial not harmless where defendant had \facially plausible claim\ which he was unable to present to trial court in a motion for new trial and to make a record for appellate review
• appellate counsel appointed 58 days after sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).