Skip to main content

Ware v. State

Citations

  • 62 S.W.3d 344
  • 2001 WL 1548896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court's judgment nunc pro tunc based on trial court's inherent power to modify judgment during trial court's plenary jurisdiction
  • affirming trial court’s judgment nunc pro tunc based on trial court’s inherent power to modify judgment during trial court's plenary jurisdiction
  • recognizing “[a] grandparent may have an identical, or an even greater motive than a parent may have in obtaining a correct diagnosis for a child,” and holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting a grandparent’s statements under Rule 803(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Livingston, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.