State v. Ennis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in felony murder case, the defendant’s confrontation rights were violated by the admission of the codefendant’s statement establishing the direct participation of “[s]omeone else” in the predicate offenses
• nontestifying codefendant was “unavailable” for Confrontation Clause purposes
• setting out Van Arsdall factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Maiden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 45×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 19×
• State v. Norby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 13×
• State v. Lahai
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-10· cited 10×
• State v. Willis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-16· cited 10×
• State v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-08-22· cited 10×
• State v. Reyes-Mauro
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 4×
• State v. Watts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-27· cited 2×
• State v. Sine
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-05

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Bruton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
• Delaware v. Van Arsdall
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
• Richardson v. Marsh
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
• Gray v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-09· cited 723×
• State v. Cook
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-11· cited 90×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-27· cited 21×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-25· cited 6×
• State v. Ennis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-07-18· cited 1×