Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/25/2004

State v. Smith

Citations

96 P.3d 1234
194 Or. App. 697
2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

statement by defendant that his father told defendant that detective claimed father would lose home if defendant contested charges admissible to show defendant had strong motive to make false confession
statement by defendant 818 State v. Schiller-Munneman that his father told defendant that detective claimed father would lose home if defendant contested charges admissible to show defendant had strong motive to make false confes- sion
testimony in which witness quotes one out-of-court declarant who in turn quotes another out-of-court declarant constitutes double hearsay as to which each of the multilevel statements must satisfy a hearsay exception or be categorized as not hearsay; citing OEC 805
where trial court sustained prosecutor’s objection after witness answered question which provoked the objection, the defendant was not required to do any more to preserve his claim of error when the court foreclosed the line of inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.