State v. Ennis
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 687
Syllabus
Consecutive sentences findings necessary to protect the public punish the offender. The trial court made the required statutory findings to support the imposition of consecutive sentences. Further, the evidence in the record supports the trial court's findings. Appellant did not demonstrate that, despite his age and poor health, the trial court erred in findings consecutive sentences were necessary to punish him.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- standard under which public school teacher may be discharged is substantially less rigorous than standard under which she may be disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits
- \Appellate courts are not fact finders\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.