State v. Dussault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, as a general rule, it is improper for a judge to communicate about pending litigation outside the presence of the parties
• relying upon and quoting Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555-56, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1157, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Heber v. Heber
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-08-01· cited 15×
• Crawford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2014-10-31· cited 14×
• Vent v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-11-16· cited 10×
• Ronald Dean Sackett v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2022-09-23· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Carl Dexter Moore
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-09-23· cited 166×
• United States v. Trung Tran Nguyen
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-28· cited 99×
• Amidon v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-12-21· cited 61×
• In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-03-09· cited 33×
• Cook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2001-10-26· cited 26×
• In Re Inquiry Concerning Robson
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1972-08-25· cited 24×
• Perotti v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-02-08· cited 23×
• Pride v. Harris
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1994-09-23· cited 19×
• In Re Cummings
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2009-07-16· cited 17×
• Alaska Trams Corp. v. Alaska Electric Light & Power
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-10-02· cited 17×
• Vaska v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-04-03· cited 12×
• Keller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2004-02-06· cited 7×