Skip to main content

Vent v. State

Citations

  • 288 P.3d 752
  • 2012 Alas. App. LEXIS 165
  • 2012 WL 5659804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “an objection is not required to preserve an issue if the appealing party had no opportunity to make an objection”
  • finding that claim was not waived because defendant “had no notice that the superior court [erred] until the court issued its written decision” and “therefore had no opportunity to object.”
  • \[A]n objection is not required to preserve an issue for appeal if the appealing party had no opportunity to make an objection.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bolger, Coats, Mannheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.