Court of Appeals of Alaska· 11/16/2012
Vent v. State
Citations
- 288 P.3d 752
- 2012 Alas. App. LEXIS 165
- 2012 WL 5659804
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “an objection is not required to preserve an issue if the appealing party had no opportunity to make an objection”
- finding that claim was not waived because defendant “had no notice that the superior court [erred] until the court issued its written decision” and “therefore had no opportunity to object.”
- \[A]n objection is not required to preserve an issue for appeal if the appealing party had no opportunity to make an objection.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bolger, Coats, Mannheimer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Griswold v. Homer City CouncilAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-09-13· cited 24×
- Jerry B. v. Sally B.Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-06-10· cited 19×
- Amy S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-04-26· cited 17×
- Heber v. HeberAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-08-01· cited 15×
- Sarah A. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-09-28· cited 13×
- PLC, LLC. and MH2, LLC. v. State of Alaska, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court· 2021-04-09· cited 8×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 1,932×
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 1,119×
- United States v. Michael O'keefe, Sr. Eric Schmidt John O'Brien Gary Bennett Paul SchmitzFifth Circuit· 1997-11-11· cited 206×
- Mosley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-10-27· cited 108×
- In Re: Bellsouth Corporation, in Re: Terry Price and Lehr, Middlebrooks, Price & Proctor, P.C.Eleventh Circuit· 2003-06-17· cited 102×
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-04· cited 72×
- United States v. BurrellEighth Circuit· 2010-09-27· cited 69×
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-10· cited 61×
- Higganbotham v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Transportation CommissionTenth Circuit· 2003-05-06· cited 55×
- Marlin v. Moody National Bank, N.A.Fifth Circuit· 2008-06-30· cited 35×
- United States v. Paul Richard ArnpriesterNinth Circuit· 1994-09-23· cited 30×
- F.T. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1993-11-05· cited 29×
- United States v. Ronald E. RobinsonEighth Circuit· 2006-03-02· cited 26×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-07· cited 26×
- United States v. Jesse L. MathisD.C. Circuit· 1976-05-18· cited 22×
- Vent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2003-04-11· cited 22×
- State v. McCrarySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 21×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-02-17· cited 21×
- City of Fairbanks v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-05-09· cited 16×
- Petzold v. Kessler Homes, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.