Vaska v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[J]udicial officers must . . . conduct themselves so as to avoid engendering reasonable suspicions of bias.” (citing Perotti v. State, 806 P.2d 325, 327 (Alaska App. 1991))
• “[J]udicial officers must . . . conduct themselves so as to avoid engendering reasonable suspicions of bias.” (citing Perotti v. State, 806 P.2d 325, 327 (Alaska App. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harlow v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2003-05-29· cited 27×
• Vaska v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 22×
• Timothy W. v. Julia M.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2017-08-25· cited 19×
• Amerada Hess Pipeline Corp. v. Regulatory Commission
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-02-15· cited 12×
• State v. Dussault
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2011-01-07· cited 6×
• Vaska v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2003-07-25· cited 6×
• Doe v. Cabrera
  District of Columbia· 2015-09-30· cited 6×
• Vickers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2008-01-18· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Parker v. Connors Steel Co.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-09-29· cited 245×
• In Re Allied-Signal Inc.
  First Circuit· 1989-12-20· cited 112×
• Hall v. Small Business Administration
  Fifth Circuit· 1983-01-14· cited 63×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1995-04-07· cited 35×
• Perotti v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-02-08· cited 23×