United States v. Carl Dexter Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judge's ex parte questioning of the defendant about a substitution of counsel issue was appropriate under the circumstances
• holding that a judge's ex parte questioning of the defendant about a substitution of counsel issue was appropriate under the circumstances
• holding that attempts to substitute counsel one month before trial and then again two weeks before trial were timely even when they would have required continuances
• holding that attempts to substitute counsel one month before trial and then again two weeks before trial were timely even when they would have required continuances
• holding that attorney’s failure to keep defendant informed of plea negotiations and to prepare for trial because he felt physically threatened by defendant demonstrated irrec- oncilable conflict
• finding timely a motion to substitute counsel made two and a half weeks before trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).