Skip to main content
· 9/23/1994

Pride v. Harris

Citations

  • 882 P.2d 381
  • 1994 Alas. LEXIS 85
  • 1994 WL 515887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judgment that has been vacated does not have res judicata effect because it is not final judgment
  • the fact that a judge has come to negative conclusions about a defendant's character, based on prior experience in court, does not necessarily indicate that the judge is biased
  • vacated judgment cannot have res judicata effect because it is not a final judgment
  • incorporating the language of former Canon 3C(1)(a)
  • incorporating the language of former Canon 3C(1)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Compton, Bryner, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.