· 3/9/1990
In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge
Citations
- 788 P.2d 716
- 1990 Alas. LEXIS 32
- 1990 WL 25917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court must independently evaluate the evidence in a judicial conduct case
- holding that the court must independently evaluate the evidence in a judicial conduct case
- applying the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions in case involving judicial misconduct
- Supreme Court is “entrusted with the ultimate decision in matters of judicial qualifications” and will “independently evaluate the evidence of record”
- “Because the purpose of judicial discipline is to protect the public rather than punish the individual judge, the proceeding is neither civil nor criminal but sui generis”
- “Because the purpose of judicial discipline is to protect the public rather than punish the individual judge, the proceeding is neither civil nor criminal but sui generis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews, Burke, Compton, Witz, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.