Skip to main content
· 3/9/1990

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge

Citations

  • 788 P.2d 716
  • 1990 Alas. LEXIS 32
  • 1990 WL 25917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court must independently evaluate the evidence in a judicial conduct case
  • holding that the court must independently evaluate the evidence in a judicial conduct case
  • applying the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions in case involving judicial misconduct
  • Supreme Court is “entrusted with the ultimate decision in matters of judicial qualifications” and will “independently evaluate the evidence of record”
  • “Because the purpose of judicial discipline is to protect the public rather than punish the individual judge, the proceeding is neither civil nor criminal but sui generis”
  • “Because the purpose of judicial discipline is to protect the public rather than punish the individual judge, the proceeding is neither civil nor criminal but sui generis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Burke, Compton, Witz, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.