Applegate v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the state was required to prove the accused had knowledge that he was delivering a controlled substance and that he intended to deliver a controlled substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1984-12-19· cited 57×
• State v. Dunn
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-07-11· cited 49×
• Stringfield v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-10-23· cited 38×
• Thomas v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1991-12-18· cited 28×
• McVeay v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 27×
• John Ashley Hale v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2016-02-04· cited 22×
• State v. Barr
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-01-15· cited 16×
• Broadus v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1980-11-19· cited 12×
• Sharbuno v. Moran
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-05-18· cited 8×
• State v. Castillo
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-03-25· cited 7×
• Worthy v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 5×