Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/20/1964
Sisk v. State
Citations
- 204 A.2d 684
- 236 Md. 589
- 1964 Md. LEXIS 917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[pjhotographs, when properly authenticated, are as a general rule held to be admissible ... to illustrate a witness’ testimony____”
- “[Pjhotographs, when properly authenticated, are as a general rule held to be admissible under two distinct rules: one, to illustrate a witness’ testimony ... and two, as ‘mute,’ ‘silent,’ or ‘dumb’ independent photographic witnesses”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney, Sybert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bergner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-12-12· cited 53×
- People v. HebelAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-08-23· cited 50×
- State v. DunnWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-07-11· cited 49×
- Sun Cab Co. v. WalstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-04-17· cited 48×
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1982-12-08· cited 45×
- McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-03· cited 40×
- Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-12· cited 33×
- Brice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-01-21· cited 26×
- State v. BerkyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-07-15· cited 19×
- State v. PulphusSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1983-08-30· cited 16×
- Mason v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-07-15· cited 15×
- Oja v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-03-27· cited 7×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-03· cited 7×
- Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. ColeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-02· cited 7×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-06· cited 5×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-07· cited 4×
- State v. MoyleMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-10-31· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. BowleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-06-18· cited 100×
- State v. GoyetSupreme Court of Vermont· 1957-05-07· cited 70×
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1882-10-31· cited 53×
- People v. DoggettCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-01-28· cited 42×
- Hancock v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1950-10-02· cited 27×
- Waye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-04· cited 21×
- King v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1922-04-19· cited 19×
- Sisk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-27· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.