Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
West Virginia Supreme Court· 7/15/1982

State v. Buck

Citations

  • 294 S.E.2d 281
  • 170 W. Va. 428
  • 1982 W. Va. LEXIS 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Pursuant to our established rule, we limit our consideration of this case to those arguments fully developed and argued and exclude others listed in the initial petition.”
  • “[A] trial court’s decision regarding the voluntariness [of consent to search] will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong or clearly against the weight of the evidence.” (quotation omitted)
  • “[A] trial court’s decision regarding the voluntariness [of consent to search] will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong or clearly against the weight of the evidence.” (quotation omitted)
  • Prosecutor's remark that it was his personal belief that the defendant was trying to kill the victim, while not condoned, was not reversible error since it did not clearly prejudice the accused or result in manifest injustice
  • Prosecutor’s remark that it was his personal belief that the defendant was trying to kill the victim, while not condoned, was not reversible error since it did not clearly prejudice the accused or result in manifest injustice
  • Buck was in there to kill him.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.