Skip to main content

State v. Dulfu

Citations

  • 426 P.3d 641
  • 363 Or. 647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the drafters of the sentenc- ing regulations intended for “criminal episode” to have the same meaning as in the former jeopardy context
  • discussing operation of the 200-percent rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Dulfu

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.