Oregon Supreme Court· 11/13/2015

State v. Cuevas

Citations

358 Or. 147
358 P.3d 147
2015 Ore. LEXIS 797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, where the adequacy of the investigation is challenged on direct examination, questions about the investigation are not beyond the scope of cross- examination
explaining that Apprendi did “not apply to factual findings that reduce a defendant’s sentence” or to “how a trial court should aggregate multiple sentences”
declining to overrule two decisions interpreting sentencing guidelines rules, in part, because those decisions had “been applied repeatedly in calculating innumerable sentences”
declining to overrule two decisions interpreting sentencing guidelines rules, in part, because those decisions had “been applied repeatedly in calculating innumerable sentences”
declining to overrule two decisions interpreting sentencing guidelines rules, in part, because those decisions had “been applied repeatedly in calculating innumerable sentences”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kistler, Walters, Landau, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.