Oregon Supreme Court· 3/8/1996
State v. Williams
Citations
- 912 P.2d 364
- 322 Or. 620
- 1996 Ore. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a defendant's statement that \he would like to rape a `girl'\ was relevant to the second question, because that statement indicated that the defendant \may act violently toward women in the future\
- a defendant’s statement that “he would like to rape a ‘girl’ ” was relevant to the second question, because that statement indicated that the defendant “may act violently toward women in the future”
- “Discussion off the record of mat- ters as to which issues on appeal could arise is ill-advised, either because no official record is made of the matters or because whatever record that is made often is summary in nature.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoomissen, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 72×
- State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court· 1998-12-10· cited 59×
- State v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court· 1998-07-24· cited 50×
- Cunningham v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-05· cited 25×
- State v. SimonsenOregon Supreme Court· 1999-08-12· cited 21×
- State v. QuebradoOregon Supreme Court· 2024-05-16· cited 21×
- Pratt v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-11· cited 11×
- State v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-13· cited 11×
- State v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21· cited 3×
- State v. AuteleOregon Supreme Court· 2024-06-13· cited 3×
- State v. JayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-26· cited 2×
- Sugiyama v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-24· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 1,326×
- California v. RamosSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 1,071×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
- State v. MoenOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 189×
- State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court· 1990-04-03· cited 170×
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 149×
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 137×
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court· 1995-11-24· cited 134×
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court· 1992-09-17· cited 134×
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 125×
- State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court· 1988-02-26· cited 124×
- Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. Yellow Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-07-03· cited 115×
- State v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 111×
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 91×
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 86×
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 79×
- Wagner v. OregonSupreme Court· 1989-07-03· cited 54×
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court· 1994-08-18· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.