New Mexico Court of Appeals· 7/28/1983
State v. Diaz
Citations
- 668 P.2d 326
- 100 N.M. 210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, during closing 17 “a prosecutor must confine himself to the facts introduced in evidence and to the fair 18 and reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom”
- reversing a conviction when the 4 prosecutor engaged in pronounced and persistent misconduct
- noting 13 that a prosecutor made “substantial reference to the authority he represented” during 14 closing arguments and that the comments could have encouraged the jury to infer that 15 the prosecutor would not try the case unless he believed in the defendant’s guilt
- even abusive language may be proper if appropriate to the facts in evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bivins, Walters, Donnelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-05-20· cited 205×
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-11-25· cited 133×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-09-03· cited 85×
- State v. SwavolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-08-04· cited 75×
- State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-08-19· cited 68×
- State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-11-15· cited 65×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-04-07· cited 65×
- State v. PenningtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-16· cited 61×
- Deaton v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-12-18· cited 60×
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-02-06· cited 57×
- State v. FergusonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-10-30· cited 50×
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-08-04· cited 40×
- State v. HennessyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-06-23· cited 37×
- Garcia v. JeantetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-09-23· cited 37×
- State v. LandersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-05-27· cited 36×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-01-09· cited 36×
- State v. RammingNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-05-12· cited 35×
- State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-10-22· cited 34×
- State v. RamosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-06-08· cited 32×
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-11· cited 30×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- State v. RuffinoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-06-24· cited 93×
- State v. DayNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-02-07· cited 85×
- State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-07-06· cited 82×
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-01-30· cited 64×
- State v. PaceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 62×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-04-14· cited 51×
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-17· cited 47×
- State v. VenegasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-05-05· cited 45×
- State v. LaraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-07-30· cited 43×
- State v. PolskyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-02-05· cited 40×
- State v. CummingsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-01-28· cited 34×
- State v. WessonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-01-21· cited 33×
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-05-19· cited 30×
- State v. AguirreNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1972-12-08· cited 29×
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-07-12· cited 28×
- State v. RheaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-04-03· cited 24×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-02-01· cited 22×
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-04-30· cited 14×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-02-10· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.