Skip to main content

State v. Reynolds

Citations

  • 804 P.2d 1082
  • 111 N.M. 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[m]atters 19 outside the record present no issue for review”
  • providing that removal of a starter from the engine compartment is sufficient to constitute burglary
  • providing that removal of a starter from the engine compartment is sufficient to constitute burglary
  • explaining that a party cannot 14 complain of prejudice that might have resulted from a situation which he participated 15 in creating
  • “Because the [district] judge’s observations of the proceedings are such a critical factor in determining whether the fairness of the trial will be affected, appellate courts review such rulings only for abuse of discretion.”
  • “Matters outside the record 21 present no issue for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Minzner, Apodaca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.