New Mexico Court of Appeals· 8/19/1986
State v. Copeland
Citations
- 727 P.2d 1342
- 105 N.M. 27
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because the language of the Implied Consent Act does not limit the number of chemical tests and multiple testing is consistent with the purpose of the Act, an extra blood test was permissible
- probable destruction of evidence justified warrantless entry into motel room and arrest of defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Hendley, Garcia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 466×
- State v. SalasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-05-18· cited 299×
- State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-05-20· cited 205×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-06-21· cited 182×
- State v. RyonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-03-03· cited 132×
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-10-14· cited 106×
- Campos v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-02-02· cited 78×
- State v. PaananenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-09-10· cited 65×
- Boone v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1986-12-31· cited 53×
- State v. GossNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-03· cited 53×
- State v. WagonerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-02-14· cited 51×
- State v. TYWAYNE H.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-01-29· cited 44×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-11-15· cited 41×
- State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-13· cited 36×
- State v. RammingNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-05-12· cited 35×
- State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-15· cited 34×
- State v. ZamoraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-04-04· cited 34×
- State v. ArredondoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-15· cited 32×
- Chavez v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-07-23· cited 32×
- State v. SnyderNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-09-16· cited 31×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 1,576×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-17· cited 99×
- State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-06-23· cited 94×
- State v. SimonsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-09-23· cited 91×
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-13· cited 74×
- State v. CastenedaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-02-25· cited 64×
- State v. VialpandoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-06-28· cited 64×
- State v. DiazNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-28· cited 55×
- State v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-05-21· cited 48×
- United States v. Jose MoralesSecond Circuit· 1986-04-16· cited 36×
- McKay v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-09-30· cited 35×
- State v. DutchoverNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-03-30· cited 35×
- United States v. Phillip Darrell Smith, Ronalda Smith, and One 1978 Pontiac BonnevilleSixth Circuit· 1984-05-08· cited 32×
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-11-15· cited 26×
- State v. ShaferNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 26×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Mark Frasier v. R. J. Henderson, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1972-07-17· cited 25×
- State v. KomotoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-08· cited 25×
- State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-01-03· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.