Skip to main content

State v. Martinez

Citations

  • 658 P.2d 428
  • 99 N.M. 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a motion for mistrial was properly denied when the judge admonished the jury to disregard the defendant's outbursts
  • holding that a motion for mistrial was properly denied when the judge admonished the jury to disregard the defendant’s outbursts
  • recognizing that the prosecutor’s characterization of the defendant as a “chola punk” was inappropriate but finding that any prejudice that might have resulted was adequately cured by instructions to the jury to disregard it
  • recognizing that the prosecutor’s characterization of the 2 1 defendant as a “chola punk” was inappropriate but finding that any prejudice that 2 might have resulted was adequately cured by instructions to the jury to disregard it
  • extent of voir dire left to sound discretion of trial court and limited only by essential demands of fairness
  • prosecutor’s reference to the defendant as a “chola punk” was determined to be inappropriate and the trial court “strongly reprimanded the prosecutor for the remark”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Payne, Riordan, Sosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.