State v. Gunzelman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on the statutory definition of threat to determine the statute was not unconstitutionally vague
• defining “threat” and “terrorize” to determine if the statute was unconstitutionally vague
• “[t]he word ‘threat’ . . . means a communicated intent to inflict physical or other harm on any person or on property”
• “[t]he word ‘threat’ . . . means a communicated intent to inflict physical or other harm on any person or on property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).