Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/31/2010

State v. Klein

Citations

228 P.3d 714
234 Or. App. 523
2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the expansion of an inquiry into matters about which an officer lacks reasonable suspicion extends the duration of a stop in violation of Article I, section 9
holding that an officer unnecessarily delayed processing a traffic citation and, at the same time, an investigation based on observation of what the officer suspected were burglary tools, when, without reasonable suspicion, the officer began asking about drugs
treating bicyclist’s violation of a traffic rule as a traffic violation
rejecting the state’s argument that “[the officer’s] questions about drugs took, at most, one minute, and * * * any delay * * * [was] a de minimis delay that did not render the duration of the traffic stop constitutionally unreasonable”
officer “had the information that he needed to conclude the traffic stop when he returned to speak with defendant after completing the warrant check”
where officer developed reasonable suspicion of one crime during a traffic stop, officer could extend the stop by asking about that crime, but could not extend it to ask about another, unrelated crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.