United States v. Timothy Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not unreasonable for officers to handcuff an individual whom they believed had perpetrated a violent crime and whom they suspected was armed
• holding that defense counsel was not ineffective because the proposed motion would not have been meritorious
• holding that, under Marks, Justice Kennedy’s opinion provided the applicable rule
• explaining that if the two-step interrogation was deliberately used, “then the analysis of the Seibert plurality and Justice Kennedy’s concurrence merge, requiring an inquiry into the sufficiency of the break in time and circumstances between the unwarned and warned confessions”
• holding that it was not unreason- 6 (...continued
• placing briefly an individual in a squad car does not convert a Tetry stop into an arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).