Court of Appeals of Kansas· 4/19/1991

State v. Cruz

Citations

809 P.2d 1233
15 Kan. App. 2d 476
1991 Kan. App. LEXIS 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that Fourth Amendment was not applicable to trespasser in house
following State v. Faulkner, 220 Kan. 153, 551 P.2d 1247 [1976], and State v. Bullocks, 2 Kan. App. 2d 48, 574 P.2d 243, rev. denied 225 Kan. 846 [1978]
\Trespassers have not been granted Fourth 10 Amendment rights because they do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the property.\
trespassers in a home had no expectation of privacy in the home
reasons given by trial court immaterial if ruling correct for any reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil, Larson, Gernon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.