Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/12/1976

State v. Faulkner

Citations

551 P.2d 1247
220 Kan. 153
1976 Kan. LEXIS 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “[knowledge signifies awareness”
“Relevancy is more a matter of logic and experience than of law. . . . Materiality, on the other hand, is largely a question of law.”
if specific intent is part of the crime charged, such as in first- degree murder, “prior convictions evidencing the requisite intent may be very probative”
when defendant’s intent to possess drugs was substantially in dispute, evidence of defendant’s prior conviction for possession of controlled substances was properly admitted
“Possession and intent, like any element of a crime, may be proved by circumstantial evidence.”
“Possession and intent, Eke any element of a crime, may be proved by circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fatzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.