Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2/13/2009
State v. Beaver
Citations
- 200 P.3d 490
- 41 Kan. App. 2d 124
- 2009 Kan. App. LEXIS 80
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- nonexclusive possession may be proven by circumstantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Green, Marquardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RosaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-05-27· cited 152×
- State v. TalkingtonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-03-06· cited 148×
- STATE of Tennessee v. Marcus RICHARDSTennessee Supreme Court· 2009-07-10· cited 79×
- State v. BeltranCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2013-05-03· cited 17×
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-09-17· cited 9×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-06-12· cited 103×
- State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-12-05· cited 65×
- State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-01-30· cited 52×
- State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-04-19· cited 45×
- State v. AnthonySupreme Court of Kansas· 1988-01-15· cited 40×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-10-27· cited 37×
- State v. BullocksCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-02-03· cited 29×
- State v. HazleyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-03-02· cited 23×
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-12-11· cited 8×
- State v. Romo-UriarieCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.