Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/3/1989

State v. Clements

Citations

770 P.2d 447
244 Kan. 411
1989 Kan. LEXIS 34
1989 WL 18543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

examining and adopting case law from Arkansas, Washington, and Vermont and stating the thrust of these opinions “is that (1
declining to hold the admission of improper profile testimony was harmless “[g]iven the highly prejudicial nature of the expert testimony and the prosecutor’s comments in closing argument”
finding evidence of psychology and treatability of a child sexual offender inadmissible
finding evidence of psychology and treatability of a child sexual offender inadmissible
examining and adopting case law from Arkansas, Washington, and Vermont and stating the thrust of these opinions “is that (1) evidence [that] only describes the characteristics of the typical offender has no relevance to whether the defendant committed the crime in question; and (2
Evidence which only describes the characteristics of the typical offender has no relevance to whether the defendant committed the crime in question.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.