Supreme Court· 5/19/1958

Hoag v. New Jersey

Citations

356 U.S. 464
78 S. Ct. 829
2 L. Ed. 2d 913
1958 U.S. LEXIS 1028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that there might be “hypothetical situations in which the [Due Process Clause of] the Fourteenth Amendment might prohibit consecutive prosecutions of multiple offenses,” but ultimately finding no Due Process violations on the facts
“‘[W]here a question of fact essential to the judgment is actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, the determination is conclusive between the parties in a subsequent action on a different cause of action.’”
dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Douglas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harlan, Warren, Douglas, Brennan, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

234 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hoag v. New Jersey

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.