Oregon Supreme Court· 11/30/1988

State v. Crenshaw

Citations

764 P.2d 1372
307 Or. 160
1988 Ore. LEXIS 756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding “that a challenge to the merits of the underlying order may be made in any appeal from an order of contempt where, for constitutional, statutory or practical reasons, no other remedy, either by appeal or mandamus, was available”
recommending mandamus, instead of contempt, as the preferred method for attacking an order compelling inspection of allegedly privileged material
a defendant may challenge underlying order on appeal from contempt judgment when there is no other practical way to do so
a challenge to the merits of an underlying order may be made in any appeal from an order of contempt where, for constitutional, statutory, or practical reasons, no other remedy was available
“[A] challenge to the merits of [an] underlying order may be made in any appeal from an order of contempt where, for constitutional, statutory or practical reasons, no other remedy, either by appeal or mandamus, was available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.