State v. Pearson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there is no right to counsel in a summary contempt proceeding” under ORS 33.096
• “The power to punish individuals for direct contempt in a summary proceeding is within the inherent authority of the court, and is necessary to preserve order and dignity in the judicial process.”
• “The power to punish individuals for direct contempt in a summary pro- ceeding is within the inherent authority of the court, and is necessary to preserve order and dignity in the judicial process.”
• reviewing summary contempt for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-14· cited 27×
• State v. Ramsey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-21· cited 8×
• Cox v. M. A. L.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-08· cited 3×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-27
• Hejazi v. Harrold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-30

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Meyrick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 136×
• State v. Crenshaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 19×
• State Ex Rel. Spencer v. Howe
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 19×
• State v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-04· cited 15×
• State v. Curran
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-09-07· cited 13×
• State v. Mendonca
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-10· cited 12×
• State Ex Rel. Hixson v. Hixson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-11-18· cited 11×
• State v. Fiala
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-05-15· cited 10×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-05-01· cited 9×
• State v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-23· cited 7×