State v. Pelham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rulings made during proceedings ancillary to criminal trial may, under certain circumstances, be challenged by petitioning for writ of mandamus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cartwright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 10×
• State v. Wixom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 9×
• State v. West
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-31· cited 7×
• State v. Lorenzo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-01-15· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Automotive Emporium, Inc. v. Murchison
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-03· cited 33×
• State v. Crenshaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 19×
• McNabb v. Oregonian Publishing Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-07-11· cited 14×
• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. T.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-08-10· cited 13×
• Hass v. Port of Portland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-04-08· cited 12×
• State ex rel. Automobile Emporium, Inc. v. Murchison
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-09-23· cited 11×
• State Ex Rel. Meyers v. Howell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-29· cited 3×
• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M.T.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-08· cited 2×