State v. Keenan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• DR 4-101(A) “does not confine the client’s ‘secrets’ to communications; indeed, they may reach the attorney from someone other than the client”
• “If the contemnor had no practical opportunity to challenge the court’s order before complying or refusing to comply, and the order was erroneous, the judgment of contempt should be set aside.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Riddle
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 17×
• In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Huffman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-05-27· cited 13×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Spencer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-11-22· cited 12×
• Cottongim v. Woods
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-04· cited 10×
• Loewinger v. Stokes
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-07-30· cited 7×
• Department of Revenue v. Universal Foods Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-12-02· cited 6×
• Oregon Health Care Ass'n v. Health Division
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-06-25· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Meredith
  California Supreme Court· 1981-07-20· cited 78×
• In Re Advisory Opinion No. 544 of the New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-07-17· cited 24×
• State v. Crenshaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 19×
• Seventh Elect Church v. Rogers
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-09-20· cited 18×
• Matter of Hanks
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-02-04· cited 18×
• Cole v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1922-03-21· cited 14×
• State ex rel. Hardy v. Gleason
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1890-04-23· cited 12×
• State v. Keenan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-15· cited 2×