Skip to main content
· 6/14/1972

Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.

Citations

  • 498 P.2d 766
  • 262 Or. 293
  • 1972 Ore. LEXIS 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where defendant sought to have trial court make in camera inspection of file, defendant was required to offer the file as an exhibit to preserve claim that any error was prejudicial
  • making requested file an exhibit was required to preserve error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, McAllister, Denecke, Holman, Howell, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.