State Ex Rel. Mix v. Newland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where court’s decree was in excess of its authority, that decree is “not void but merely voidable,” so long as court had jurisdiction
• explaining that the defendant could be held in contempt for failing to comply with an invalid injunction, but also concluding that an award of attorney fees was not appropriate under the circumstances
• if court has jurisdiction over parties and subject matter, party who fails to comply with its order may be held in contempt even if it later appears that the original order was voidable because it was in excess of the court’s authority
• discussing these concepts in contempt context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. McDonnell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-20· cited 38×
• State v. Crenshaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 19×
• In Interest of C.N.
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1991-09-06· cited 19×
• In re Marriage of Barrett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-11-25· cited 19×
• State ex rel. Renninger v. Renninger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-04· cited 18×
• Oregon Education Ass'n v. Oregon Taxpayers United
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 18×
• Leyba v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1994-10-06· cited 16×
• Polygon Northwest Co. v. NSP Development, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-25· cited 13×
• State v. Graham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-18· cited 12×
• State Ex Rel. McKinley Automotive, Inc. v. Oldham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-09-26· cited 11×
• State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-06-05· cited 11×
• Matter of Marriage of Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 11×
• State v. Ryan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-09· cited 8×
• State v. Riddell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 8×
• Department of Revenue v. Universal Foods Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-12-02· cited 6×
• State v. Maack
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-15· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Pyle v. Pyle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 5×
• State v. Lucero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-04· cited 5×
• State v. Arnold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-01-02· cited 5×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. United Mine Workers of America
  Supreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
• McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.
  Supreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,180×
• United States v. Ryan
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 639×
• Walker v. City of Birmingham
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 621×
• Donovan v. City of Dallas
  Supreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 365×
• Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.
  Supreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 357×
• In Re Green
  Supreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 103×
• People Ex Rel. Day v. . Bergen
  New York Court of Appeals· 1873-09-23· cited 36×
• State v. La Follette
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1921-03-22· cited 25×
• Helms Groover & Dubber Co. v. Copenhagen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1919-01-21· cited 22×
• Mix v. Newland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-10-16· cited 1×