Skip to main content
· 2/17/1977

State Ex Rel. Mix v. Newland

Citations

  • 560 P.2d 255
  • 277 Or. 191
  • 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1093

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where court’s decree was in excess of its authority, that decree is “not void but merely voidable,” so long as court had jurisdiction
  • explaining that the defendant could be held in contempt for failing to comply with an invalid injunction, but also concluding that an award of attorney fees was not appropriate under the circumstances
  • if court has jurisdiction over parties and subject matter, party who fails to comply with its order may be held in contempt even if it later appears that the original order was voidable because it was in excess of the court’s authority
  • discussing these concepts in contempt context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, O'Connell, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.