McDonald v. City of Saint Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no property interest arises where state law leaves “considerable discretion” in the hands of the school board
• holding that no property interest arises where state law leaves “considerable discretion” in the hands of the school board
• declining to review appellant’s challenge to magistrate’s order denying non-dispositive motion, because he did not object to such order before district court
• “McDonald also must show that the conspiracy is fueled by some class-based, invidiously discriminatory animus.” (quotation omitted)
• “As a threshold, matter, McDonald must demonstrate that the defendants treated him differently than similarly situated ‘Candidates.”
• appellate court could not review magistrate’s order denying non-dispositive motion, because appellant failed to object to order before district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).