Supreme Court of New Jersey· 5/17/2000

State v. Cooke

Citations

751 A.2d 92
163 N.J. 657
2000 N.J. LEXIS 529

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding New Jersey Constitution requires existence of exigent circumstances for application of automobile exception to warrant requirement, notwithstanding Supreme Court decision to contrary
concluding New Jersey Constitution requires existence of exigent circumstances for application of automobile exception to warrant requirement, notwithstanding Supreme Court decision to contrary
holding state had burden of showing both probable cause and exigent circumstances
holding state had burden of showing both probable cause and exigent circumstances
outlining those occasions in which “this Court has interpreted our State Constitution as affording its citizens greater protections than those afforded by its federal counterpart”
declining to apply the holding of Labron to evaluate cases under the New Jersey Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Verniero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Cooke

36 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.