State v. Cooke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that subsections 322.34(2) and (5) contain elements not found in the other offense, and therefore convictions for both offenses do not constitute double jeopardy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-28· cited 3×
• Hagood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-07· cited 3×
• Duff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-09· cited 2×
• State v. Gil
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-09-07· cited 1×
• Barnes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-08· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×