Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/9/2007

Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

Citations

  • 914 A.2d 735
  • 396 Md. 469
  • 18 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1623
  • 2007 Md. LEXIS 7
  • 2007 WL 49094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, when reviewing a circuit court’s grant of summary judgement, ”[w]e consider, de novo, first, whether a material fact was placed in genuine dispute, thus requiring a trial, and ... whether the Circuit Court was legally correct in granting summary judgment.”
  • noting that remedial statutes, like State Gov’t § 20-1202, “should be construed liberally in favor of claimants seeking its protection”
  • stating that Title VII is “the federal analog” to the MFEPA and 25 that Maryland courts thus “traditionally seek guidance from federal cases in nehieting” the MFEPA
  • noting that Maryland courts “traditionally seek guidance from federal cases” in interpreting the MFEPA
  • providing that Maryland courts “traditionally seek guidance from federal cases in interpreting [MFEPA]”
  • dismissing ADA claim in part for failure to state facts indicating that the company employed fifteen or more employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell, Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

118 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.